Publikationen Stadt- und Umweltpsychologie

Publikationen in u:cris

2025


Vaupotič N, Grellier J, Martin L, Domènech Panicello C, Goszczyńska E, Kojimahara N et al. 5G technology, health and society: misconceptions, blind spots and insights from experts, non-experts, and self-identified electrosensitive individuals. Journal of Risk Research. 2025;28(5):446-470. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2025.2512074

Richter I, Gabe-Thomas E, Avillanosa AL, Creencia LA, Sumeldan J, Pahl S. Co‐created environmental messaging for climate action: Insights from coastal communities in the Global South. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2025;28(4):e70049. doi: 10.1111/ajsp.70049

Voronkova A, Miller AE, Praptiwi RA, Pratiwi PDL, Sugardjito J, White MP et al. Gender Differences in Perceptions of Environmental Changes in West Kalimantan, Indonesia: Existing and Shifting Social Roles. Society and Natural Resources. 2025. Epub 2025. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2025.2534958

Rosman T, Edelsbrunner PA, Hendriks F, Vaupotič N, Wingen T. Leveraging Psychological Insights for Effective Science Communication. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 2025;233(1):1-5. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000584

Gangl K, Seifert M, Lange PAMV, Pahl S. Nature Posters Enhance Subjective but not Objective Cleanness in Public Housing: Evidence from a Field Experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2025;101:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102496

Koller K, Pahl S. Role-Playing for Better Climate Discussions: Exploring Climate Change Engagement among Austrian Youth. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2025;104. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102616

2024


McDougall CW, Elliott LR, White MP, Grellier J, Bell S, Bratman GN et al. What types of nature exposure are associated with hedonic, eudaimonic and evaluative wellbeing? An 18-country study. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2024 Dez;100:102479. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102479

Thompson RC, Courtene-Jones W, Boucher J, Pahl S, Raubenheimer K, Koelmans AA. Twenty years of microplastic pollution research-what have we learned? Science (New York, N.Y.). 2024 Okt 25;386(6720). doi: 10.1126/science.adl2746

Doell KC, Todorova B, Vlasceanu M, Bak Coleman JB, Pronizius E, Schumann P et al. The International Climate Psychology Collaboration: Climate change-related data collected from 63 countries. Scientific Data. 2024 Okt 1;11(1):1066. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03865-1

Većkalov B, Geiger SJ, Bartoš F, White MP, Rutjens BT, van Harreveld F et al. A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. Nature Human Behaviour. 2024 Okt;8(10):1892-1905. Epub 2024 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01928-2

Mizen A, Thompson DA, Watkins A, Akbari A, Garrett JK, Geary R et al. The use of Enhanced Vegetation Index for assessing access to different types of green space in epidemiological studies. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology. 2024 Sep;34(5):753-760. Epub 2024 Feb 29. doi: 10.1038/s41370-024-00650-5

Arato J, White MP, Davison SMC, Pahl S, Taylor T, Krainz M et al. Environmental protection is more important to European citizens of all political persuasions than economic growth: A 14-country study in the marine context. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2024 Aug 24;207:116845. Epub 2024 Aug 24. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116845

Suffill E, van Paridon J, Lupyan G. Mind Melds: Verbal Labels Induce Greater Representational Alignment. Open Mind. 2024 Aug 9;8:950-971. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00153

Vaupotič N, Kienhues D, Jucks R. Complexity appreciated: How the communication of complexity impacts topic-specific intellectual humility and epistemic trustworthiness. Public Understanding of Science. 2024 Aug;33(6):740-756. Epub 2024 Feb 15. doi: 10.1177/09636625241227800

Nuojua S, Cracknell D, Heske A, Pahl S, Wyles KJ, Thompson RC. Global scoping review of behavioral interventions to reduce plastic pollution with recommendations for key sectors. Conservation Science and Practice. 2024 Aug;6(8):e13174. doi: 10.1111/csp2.13174

Liu G, Cao P, Sun Z, Han M, White MP. Mapping gender patterns in “dynamic cultural spaces”: the case of Beijing’s open-air antiques “ghost market” at Panjiayuan. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024 Jul 19. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03449-9